LumicSec
Loading secure workspace…
Security methodology
LumicSec separates authorization, evidence quality, severity and verification so automation does not silently become a stronger security claim than the evidence supports.
Assessment model
Uses authorized, non-destructive public observation and bounded evidence collection to establish posture, findings and remediation priorities. Ownership and permission authority remain server-enforced before assessment execution.
Uses a separate assessment authority for application behavior behind login. It requires verified ownership, explicit assessment authorization, isolated session handling, exact-origin boundaries and a supported secure browser runtime. Customer execution remains fail-closed when required runtime or plan policy is unavailable.
Evidence confidence
Direct representative evidence supports the stated condition.
Multiple observed signals support the conclusion without overstating certainty.
A condition deserves attention but needs additional validation before a stronger claim.
Representative evidence was unavailable or insufficient; LumicSec withholds unsupported certainty.
The assessment did not evaluate this surface or control.
Severity framework
Evidence indicates an urgent security condition with potentially severe impact. Prioritize immediate investigation and remediation.
A significant security weakness or exposure is supported by evidence and should be prioritized quickly.
A meaningful weakness is present but generally carries lower urgency than High or Critical findings.
A lower-impact hardening opportunity or limited-risk condition was observed.
Context or security hygiene information that is useful but is not presented as a vulnerability.
Retest Comparison
A later authorized assessment can compare compatible finding evidence on the same website. Disappearance or improvement alone is not presented as authoritative proof of a fix.